The role of language in discipline in improving academic english competence of interdisciplinary students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/cendikia.v15i6.6589Keywords:
Academic Discipline, Academic English, Academic Literacy, Language In Discipline , Vocabulary MeaningAbstract
Language plays a crucial role in academic and professional communication, particularly due to the diverse terminology used across different disciplines. Variations in the meaning of vocabulary in fields such as law, science, economics, and maritime studies often create ambiguity, especially for learners of academic English. This study aims to analyze how the meaning of English vocabulary shifts based on disciplinary context. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, data were collected through literature review and document analysis. The findings reveal that a single English word can hold different meanings depending on the field in which it is used—for instance, the word “sentence” generally refers to a linguistic unit, whereas in legal discourse, it denotes a judicial punishment. These results underscore the significant influence of disciplinary context on vocabulary interpretation and usage. The study highlights the importance of contextual language understanding to improve academic literacy and English proficiency among interdisciplinary students and professionals. Furthermore, the findings contribute to the development of discipline-specific academic English curricula and offer practical guidance for more effective English language teaching and learning.
References
Ashurova, D. U. (2021). Interdisciplinary approach to language. Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin, 6(2), 127–137.
Biglan, A. (1971). The Relationship of University Department Organization to the Characteristics of Academic Tasks. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Bunch, G. C., & Martin, D. (2021). From “academic language” to the “language of ideas”: A disciplinary perspective on using language in K-12 settings. Language and Education, 35(6), 539–556.
Cook-Sather, A. (2018). Listening to equity-seeking perspectives: How students’ experiences of pedagogical partnership can inform wider discussions of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(5), 923–936.
Fedorenko, S. (2018). Humanistic foundations of foreign language education: theory and practice.
Firdaus, F., Zulfadilla, Z., & Caniago, F. (2021). Research methodology: Types in the new perspective. Manazhim, 3(1), 1–16.
Khan, A. (2024). Integrating perspectives: The role of multidisciplinary approaches in solving complex problem. Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(08), 400–410.
Lin, L. H. F., & Morrison, B. (2021). Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of Engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 59–70.
Liu, X., Gu, M. M., & Jin, T. (2024). Strategy use in collaborative academic reading: Understanding how undergraduate students co-construct comprehension of academic texts. Language Teaching Research, 28(4), 1391–1411.
MacLeod, M. (2018). What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice. Synthese, 195(2), 697–720.
Mauranen, A., Pérez-Llantada, C., & Swales, J. M. (2020). Academic Englishes: A standardised knowledge? In The Routledge handbook of world Englishes (pp. 659–676). Routledge.
Pamzan, M., Javaid, Z. K., & Ali, A. A. (2023). Perception of students about collaborative strategies employed by teachers for enhancing English vocabulary and learning motivation. Pakistan JL Analysis & Wisdom, 2, 146.
Perna, L. W. (2023). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume 38.
Qudsia, B. (2024). Complex challenges and multidisciplinary solutions: A strategic approach. Research Journal, 2(1), 26–39.
Salam, M., Awang Iskandar, D. N., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 573–593.
Scharp, K. M., & Thomas, L. J. (2019). Disrupting the humanities and social science binary: Framing communication studies as a transformative discipline. Review of Communication.
Schorske, C. E., & Bender, T. (2021). American academic culture in transformation: Fifty years, four disciplines.
Shahjahan, R. A., Estera, A. L., Surla, K. L., & Edwards, K. T. (2022). “Decolonizing” curriculum and pedagogy: A comparative review across disciplines and global higher education contexts. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 73–113.
Tarafdar, M., & Davison, R. M. (2018). Research in information systems: Intra-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary approaches. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(6), 523–551.
Thompson, G. A., & Watkins, K. (2021). Academic language: Is this really (functionally) necessary? Language and Education, 35(6), 557–573.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marlina Tampubolon, Rani Rakasiwi, Masriani Mery Rosmida Silalahi, Ricky Asi Erwindo Siahaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
