Main Article Content

Afdhal Jihad

Abstract

Recurrent flooding in Aceh Barat Daya severely disrupts school operations, threatens physical safety, interrupts learning access, and erodes community well?being. Existing research presents three key gaps: empirically, studies focus largely on infrastructure repair or traditional preparedness and rarely examine informatization as a governance capability; theoretically, models separate digital systems from adaptive leadership rather than integrating them; methodologically, accounts remain mostly descriptive without cross?case analysis of adoption processes. This qualitative multiple?case study investigates how three flood?prone public schools integrate digital systems, shared information platforms, and collaborative management to strengthen safety assurance, adaptive decision?making, and learning continuity. Data from interviews, documents, and observations were analysed using thematic analysis. Key findings identify four interconnected dimensions: digital early warning and coordination, data?driven governance, informatization?enabled hybrid continuity, and collective safety management. As a novelty, the study proposes the Digital Adaptive Educational Safety Framework, which unites these components while aligning technology with local cultural practices—shifting response from reactive to proactive. The findings advance understanding of how information systems build educational resilience, relevant for disaster?prone regions globally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jihad, A. . (2026) “Digital adaptive governance and school safety: informatization for post-flood educational continuity in Aceh Barat Daya”, Jurnal Mantik, 10(2), pp. 534-543. doi: 10.35335/mantik.v10i2.7357.
References
Berkes & Ross. (2016). Panarchy and community resilience:. Sustainability science and policy implications. Environmental Science & Policy, 185-193.
Braun & Clark. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Creswell & Poth. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
Gash, A. &. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,, 18(4), 543–571.
Gash, A. &. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Gutman. (2024). Challenges facing education leadership in the shadow of war: International and multicultural perspectives from zones of conflict. . Taylor & Francis.
Hallinger et al. (2015). Cultural context, principal instructional leadership, and teacher efficacy: A meta-analytic review, 1989–2024. . A meta-analytic review, 1989–2024. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432251349810.
Harris & Jones. (2020). COVID 19–school leadership in disruptive times. School leadership & management, 40(4), 243-247.
Heifetz et al. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. New York: Harvard business press.
Jailani. (2026). Post-Flood Recovery and Disaster-Resilient Education Policy Implementation in Islamic Schools in Aceh Tamiang. . Ta'dib,, 29(1), 175-192.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School leadership and management, 28(1), 27-42.
Katiman. (2021). Village governance and deliberative democracy: Examining empowered deliberative forums in rural villages, Indonesia. The Australian National University (Australia).
Kusumasari & Alam. (2012). Local wisdom?based disaster recovery model in Indonesia. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 21(3), 351-369.
Lassa et al. (2023). Understanding the impacts of floods on learning quality, school facilities, and educational recovery in Indonesia. Disasters, 47(2), 412-436.
Lincoln & Guba. (2016). The constructivist credo. . Routledge.
Matambo et al. (2026). Impact of Adaptive Leadership on Urban Governance and Service Delivery Innovation in Local Authorities:. A Systematic Literature Review. Strategic Business Research,., 100131.
Patton. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. SAGE.
Reich, J., Buttimer, C., Coleman, D., Colwell, R., Faruqi, F., & Larke, L. (2020). What's lost, what's left, what's next: Lessons learned from the lived experiences of teachers during the 2020 novel coronavirus pandemic.
Shah et al. (2020). Disaster risk management insight on school emergency preparedness–a case study of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Shah, A. A., Gong, Z., Pal, I., Sun, R., Ullah, W., & Wani, G. F. (2020). Disaster risk management insight on school emergency preparedness–a case study of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101805., 51, 101805.
Trinidad & Protacio-De Castr. (2020). The institutionalization of mental health and psychosocial support in emergencies in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101918.
Uhl-Bien & Arena. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The leadership quarterly, 29(1), 89-104.
UNICE. ( 2025). Learning interrupted: Global snapshot of climate-related school disruptions in 2024. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2-4.
Yin. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE.
Yukl, M. &. ((2020). 18 Leader Behaviors and the Changing Nature of Work (pp. 383-405). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yurkofsky & Peurach,. ((2023). The paradox of leading amidst uncertainty: Maintaining balance on an unstable beam. . Journal of Educational Administration, 61(3), 185-204.
Zuckerman. (2024). Beyond the school walls: Collective impact in micropolitan school-community. In Thinking Ecologically in Educational Policy and Research, (pp. 98-111).