Main Article Content

Asbi Maulana
M. Risal

Abstract

This study aims to describe and identify the role of work motivation and workload in influencing employee performance. The total population in this study were 35 employees at the Regional Research and Development Agency of Palopo City. Hypothesis testing using multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS application, Y = 4,800 + 0,449X1+0,301X2. Results obtained on  Partial testing (t-test) is that the motivation variable has a significant positive effect on employee performance 2,209 and the workload variable has a positive and significant effect on employee performance 1,782. The results of the determination coefficient test show a value of 0.304, meaning that employee performance is influenced by work motivation and workload of 30.4%, while the remaining 69.6% is influenced by other variables. The result of the calculation is that the number F count (7.002) > F table (4.14) so ??that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Partially and simultaneously, motivation and workload have a significant effect on employee performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Maulana, A. . . and Risal, M. . . (2022) “The Effect of Work Motivation and Workload on Employee Performance in Regional Research and Development Agency”, Jurnal Mantik, 5(4), pp. 2280-2285. Available at: https://www.iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/1887 (Accessed: 16March2025).
References
[1] R. Mahardika, “Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Survei Karyawan Pt. Axa Financial Indonesia Sales Office Malang,” J. Adm. Bisnis, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2013.
[2] J. R. Sugiharjo And F. Aldata, “Pengaruh Beban Kerja Dan Motivasi Kerja Pada Karyawan Bpjs Ketenagakerjaan Cabang Salemba,” J. Imiah Manaj. Dan Bisnis, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2018.
[3] K. F. Paramitadewi, “Pengaruh Beban Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawan Sekretariat Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Tabanan,” E-Jurnal Manaj., Vol. 6, No. 6, 2017.
[4] D. P. Setiawan, “Pengaruh Beban Kerja Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pt. Macanan Jaya Cemerlang Klaten – Jawa Tengah – Indonesia,” 2015.
[5] B. K. Palopo, Rencana Strategis Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Daerah Kota Palopo 2018-2023. 2019.
[6] D. J. Priansa, Perencanaan Dan Pengembangan Sdm. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014.
[7] A. A. A. P. Mangkunegara, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Pt. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.
[8] K. D. Negeri, Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 18 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pedoman Analisi Beban Kerja Di Lingkungan Departemen Dalam Negeri. 2008.
[9] D. Sunyoto, Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: Caps, 2012.
[10] A. Astianto, “Pengaruh Stres Kerja Dan Beban Kerja Terhadapa Kinerja Karyawan Pdam Surabaya,” Surabaya?: Stiesa, 2014.
[11] A. T. Sitepu, “Beban Kerja Dan Motivasi Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Pt. Bank Tabungan Negara Tbk Cabang Manado,” J. Emba, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2016.
[12] Rahmayanti, “Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Cv. Putra Kaltim Samarinda,” Ejournal Ilmu Adm. Bisnis, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2014.
[13] N. M. N. C. Cahyani, “Pengaruh Kompensasi Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening,” Ejurnal Manaj. Unud, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016.
[14] S. Farisi, “Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Disiplin Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan,” J. Hum., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2020.
[15] I. W. Juniantara And I. G. Riana, “Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Koperasi Di Denpasar,” E-Jurnal Ekon. Dan Bisnis Univ. Udayana, 2015.